Planning evaluation future Present past Week 2 surjono 11/02/2018

Presentasi berjudul: "Planning evaluation future Present past Week 2 surjono 11/02/2018"— Transcript presentasi:

1 Planning evaluation future Present past Week 2 surjono 11/02/2018
“In the Name of GOD, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.  Planning evaluation future Present past Week 2 surjono 11/02/2018

2 METODE EVALUASI OLEH Lichfield:
ISU PERENCANAAN: ASPIRASI MASYARAKAT MEMBERIKAN JUSTIFIKASI PADA PEMERINTAH UNTUK MELAKUKAN INTERVENSI (CHAPIN AND KAISER 1979) METODE EVALUASI OLEH Lichfield: PLANNING BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS (PBSA) COMMUNITY IMPACT EVALUATION (CIE) NAMUN SERINGKALI: ‘KEBUTUHAN MASYARAKAT’ TIDAK BERASAL DARI PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT YANG PLURAL “KEBUTUHAN MASYARAKAT” BANYAK DIPENGARUHI NILAI INDIVIDUAL “KEBUTUHAN MASYARAKAT” TIDAK SELALU DIPRIORITASKAN

3 PLANNING (RATIONALITY WEBER):
SEKILAS SEJARAH: PROSES sejarah: Trancendental reason Descartes Concept of Universal Reason Classic Rationality (“MODERNITY”) RATIONAL MODEL OF PLANNING REAL SOCIAL CONTEXT PLANNING (RATIONALITY WEBER): INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY SUBSTANTIVE RATIONALITY VALUE RATIONALITY RASIONALITI MENURUT WEBER:

4 METODE EVALUASI BERDASAR PENDEKATAN RASIONALITAS
RASIONALITAS STRATEGIS RASIONALITAS KOMUNIKATIF RASIONALITAS INSTRUMEN RASIONALITAS SUBSTANSI RASIONALITAS TERBATAS

5 1. INSTRUMENT RATIONALITY
LOGICAL CHOICE OF TOOLS TO GET THE GOAL ESSENTIALLY A PRESCRIPTIVE IDEAL MODEL EVALUATION CRITIERIA: CAPABLE IN VALUING INTANGIBLE INDICATORS / PARAMETERS : Benefit cost ratio (bcr) Net present value (npv) Internal rate of return (irr) SIMPLE INSTRUMENTAL: COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS (CBA) (TIDAK DAPAT DIGUNAKAN UNTUK TUJUAN GANDA/JAMAK (MULTIPLE GOALS)) COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS (CEA) (UNTUK EVALUASI ALTERNATIF PROGRAM ATAU ALTERNATIF KINERJA)

6 2. Substantive rationality More complex method, goals and objectives are evaluated, set priorities
LICHFIELD (1996): PLANNING BALANCE SHEET COMMUNITY IMPACT EVALUATION KRITERIA EVALUASI: MULTI CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK METODE EVALUASI A.L.: SKEMA COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS YANG LEBIH KOMPREHENSIF MULTI OBJECTIVE EVALUATION APPROACH / METHOD (MODM), EVAMIX (SHEFFER 1997), EXPERT CHOICE (SAATY 1994) (SOCIAL) IMPACT ANALYSIS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA), MULTI CRITERIA EVALUATION (MCE).

7 3. BOUNDED RATIONALITY (RASIONALITAS TERBATAS)
BEBERAPA PENDEKATAN: DISJOINTED INCREMENTALISM: LIMIT RANGE OF OPTION COMPARISON AT THE MARGIN CONTOH: METODE STUDI KOMPARASI, BENCHMARKING 2. PRAGMATIC RATIONALITY KRITERIA EVALUASI: KRITERIA DENGAN SCORING METODE: SATISFICING: SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT OF AVAILABLE OPTIONS

8 4. STRATEGIC RATIONALITY
METODE A.L.: SCENARIO METHOD (IF – THEN) STRATEGIC WAR GAMES KRITERIA EVALUASI: RETREAT FROM FORMAL ANALYsis methods, toward informal, intuitive and interactive situation assessment and evaluation GOAL ORIENTED SELF- INTERESTED DECISION MAKER INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT THAT HOUSES PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE ACTORS

9 5. Communicative rationality
Putting the actor in context Assumes actors seeking consensus Evaluation criteria: Social acceptability Evaluation method: Social approach Persuasive: focus group discussion (fgd)

10 That’s all for this week baca referensi, buka kembali mk m. a
That’s all for this week baca referensi, buka kembali mk m.a.p terkait metode yang bersesuaian dengan evaluasi perencanaan selamat belajar