Upload presentasi
Presentasi sedang didownload. Silahkan tunggu
1
VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
assalamu’alaikum wr. wb PERENCANAAN TAPAK VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Johannes Parlindungan Siregar PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA
2
PENDAHULUAN KUALITAS LINGKUNGAN MERUPAKAN OUTPUT PALING PENTING DALAM PERENCANAAN SALAH SATU KOMPONEN UTAMANYA ADALAH PENAMPILAN
4
TUJUAN ANALISIS 1 MENGUKUR PERANAN VISUAL SUATU BENTANG ALAM TERHADAP TAPAK KAJIAN 2 MENEMUKAN POTENSI DAN PERMASALAHAN VISUAL TAPAK 3 MENENTUKAN TINDAKAN YANG SESUAI DALAM MENGEMBAGKAN POTENSI VISUAL TAPAK SESUAI KONSEP PERENCANAAN
5
KONSEP ANALISIS LANDSCAPE COMPONENTS LAND & WATER VEGETATION STRUCTURE
6
VISUAL ELEMENTS COLOR FORM LINE TEXTURE SCALE SPATIAL CHARACTER
7
COLOR
8
FORM DIMENSIONAL SHAPE:
Kontras dalam warna dan tekstur, membentuk pola 2 dimensi DIMENSIONAL MASS: Benda yang memiliki volume dan memberi efek visual 3 dimensi.
10
LINE EDGE BAND SILHOUTTE LINE
12
TEXTURE GRAIN DENSITY REGULARITY
14
SCALE ABSOLUTE RELATIVE
15
LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION
SPATIAL LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION SPATIAL POSITION BACKDROP
17
VISUAL IMPACT SEVERITY
PENAMBAHAN UNSUR BUATAN YANG MEMPENGARUHI PERUBAHAN TAMPILAN KAWASAN SKALA BANGUNAN & MENARA MENDOMINASI LANTAI LANSEKAP GEOMETRI BANGUNAN & MENARA YG KONTRAS DALAM BENTUK DAN GARIS VISUAL CONTRAST VISUAL DOMINANCE RELATIVE INPORTANCE
18
METODOLOGI VARIABEL & ANALISIS VISUAL CONTRAST COLOR CONTRAST
FORM CONTRAST LINE CONTRAST TEXTURE CONTRAST SCALE CONTRAST VARIABEL & ANALISIS
19
VISUAL CONTRAST RATING
SCALE DOMINANCE SPATIAL DOMINANCE VISUAL IMPACT SEVERITY
20
DATA
21
OVERAL ELEMENT RATINGS
VISUAL ELEMENTS COMPONENTS Land &Water Vegeta- tion Struc- ture COLOR CONTRAST High 9 Med 6 Low 3 None FORM CONTRAST LINE CONTRAST TEXTURE CONTRAST SCALE CONTRAST OVERAL ELEMENT RATINGS OVERAL ELEMENT SCORES High 9 Med 6 Low 3 None OVERAL HIGH : 1-3 Components HIGH or 3 Components Med OVERAL MEDIUM : 1-2 Components MEDIUM with no higher ratings OVERAL LOW : 1-3 Components LOW with no higher ratings OVERAL NONE : All components none TOTAL SCORES A
22
B C CRITERIA CATEGORY SCORE SCALE DOMINANCE
Major object in confined setting Dominant 12 On of several major objects or major object in unconfined setting Co-dominant 8 Significant object Subordinate 4 Small object insignificant B ELEMENTS SPATIAL DOMINANCE COMPOSITION Prominent Significant Inconspicuous POSITION BACKDROP PARAMETER CATEGORY SCORE 2-3 Ratings prominent DOMINANT 6 1 rating prominent or 2 highest ratings significant CO-DOMINANT 4 1 highest rating significant SUBORDINATE 2 All ratings inconspicuous INSIGNIFICANT C
23
VISUAL IMPACT SEVERITY
CATEGORY TOTAL SCORES SEVERE 36-45 A + B +C STRONG 27-35 MODERATE 18-26 WEAK 9-17 NEGLIGIBLE 0-8 SEVERE NEGLIGIBLE VARIASI PADA KOMPONEN DAN ELEMEN TAPAK YANG BERPENGARUH PADA MENINGKATNYA PERUBAHAN VISUAL TAPAK
25
Daftar Pustaka Foundation for Visual Project Analysis Smardon, et al. John Wiley & Sons Publication. \Visual Impact Assessment Manual Department of Landscape Architecture. University of California. California. Visual Assessment of Proposed Cell Structure Conybeare Morrison International.
Presentasi serupa
© 2024 SlidePlayer.info Inc.
All rights reserved.