1Dr. Ramlan Ginting, S.H., LL.M Konvensi New York 1958Dr. Ramlan Ginting, S.H., LL.M
2Article V1. Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, only if that party furnishes to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof that:
3Article VThe parties to the agreement referred to in article II were, under the law applicable to them, under some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made; or
4Article Vb. The party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or
5Article Vc. The award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be recognized and enforced; or
6Article Vd. The composition of the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or
7Article Ve. The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made.
8Article V2. Recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may also be refused if the competent authority in the country where recognition and enforcement is sought finds that: a. The subject matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of that country; or b. The recognition and enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of that country.
9Pasal 60 UU ArbitrasePutusan arbitrase bersifat final dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap dan mengikat para pihak
10Pasal 61 UU ArbitraseDalam hal para pihak tidak melaksanakan putusan arbitrase secara sukarela, putusan dilaksanakan berdasarkan perintah Ketua Pengadilan Negeri atas permohonan salah satu pihak yang bersengketa
11Pasal 62 ayat (2) UU Arbitrase Ketua Pengadilan Negeri sebelum memberikan perintah pelaksanaan, memeriksa terlebih dahulu apakah putusan arbitrase memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 4 (perjanjian arbitrase) dan Pasal 5 (cakupan kewenangan arbitrase) serta tidak bertentangan dengan kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum
12Pasal 62 ayat (3) UU Arbitrase Dalam hal putusan arbitrase tidak memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 5 serta bertentangan dengan kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum, Ketua Pengadilan Negeri menolak permohonan pelaksanaan eksekusi dan terhadap putusan Ketua Pengadilan Negeri tersebut tidak terbuka upaya hukum apa pun
13Pasal 62 ayat (4) UU Arbitrase Ketua Pengadilan Negeri tidak memeriksa alasan atau pertimbangan dari putusan arbitrase