Examination at Trial Criminal Procedure Law (Article 145-216 CP Code)

CRIMINAL PROCEEDING

JUVENILE COURT

REVISION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

Courtroom JUDGES Public Prosecutor The Accused+ Lawyer WITNESS PUBLIC BENCH

Courtroom JUDGES Public Prosecutor The Accused+ Lawyer WITNESS PUBLIC BENCH

Courtroom JUDGES PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT WITNESS JURY PUBLIC BENCH

Trial Examination Principles Art. 153 CP Code Open Trial and open to public except… Children under 17 yo not allowed to attend The Presence of the Accused The Head Judge lead the examination Conducted orally (Oral Debat) in Bahasa Indonesia

Trial Examination Principles Examined Freely (nothing was given involuntarily). Art. 153 (4): void by operation of law (Batal demi hukum)

Type of Examination Procedures Ordinary Examination Procedure (153 KUHAP) Summary Examination Procedure (203 KUHAP) Express Examination Procedure: Minor Offense Traffic Offense

Category: What kind of offense? What is the penalty? See Art.205 How is the evidence? Is it difficult/not to prove the offense? How is the application of the law? Simple/not?

Type of Examination Procedures in France Tribunal de Police= Express court Tribunal de Correctionnel = Summary La cour d’Assis = Ordinary Examination Procedure.

Category: Type of offense: Contravention = Traffic Offence /misdemeanor Delits = Summary Examination Crimes = Manslaughter, Corruption, etc.

ORDINARY EXAMINATION PROCEDURES

COUR D’ASSIS PROCEDURE

Ordinary Examination Procedure Everybody shall arise before the judges enter the court room The Head judge opened the trial and declare it is open to the public Ordered PP to summon the Accused to enter the court room. (Art. 154 CP Code) Remind the Accused to pay attention to all that he/she hears and observes at trial.

Ordinary Examination Procedure The Accused Identity (Art. 155:1) PP Read out Bill of indictment (Art.155:2a) Asked the Accused whether truly understood/not. See Also Art. 230-232

EXCEPTIE/OBJECTION Art. 156 CP Code (OBJECTION) Competency: absolute/relatif Indictment cannot be accepted (Art. 143 para 2a CP Code) Indictment must be revoked (Art.143 para 2b CP Code) Systematic way of objection: Introduction Opening Statement Posita (body of the exception) Petitum (Resume of the exception)

Type of Objection: E. Obscuur Libelli: Materiel E. Error in Persona: Formal E. Preemptor: Penal Code 76, 77, 78 E. Litispendentia: Competency E. concerning Complaint E. Premature: joiner/skip the procedure E. Disqualificatoire: no legal standing

STATE IRIS OPINION OF PP The court is competent to adjudicate The bill of indictment validly made, and up to the materiel and formal standard (Art. 143 CP Code)

Content of Interlocutory Decision Objection Sustained: No further examination Objection rejected: continue the examination Will be decided upon completion of the examination

CHALLENGE To the High Court Through the District Court (Art. 156 para 3) Challenge by the Accused accepted by the HC (Art. 156 para 4 and 5) PP revise the indictment Legal Counsel not agree, the examination continued.

EVIDENCE HEARING

Requisitory Defenses Closing Statement Systematical Content Introduction Opening Statement Court Facts Fact Analysis Legal Analysis Summary Claim Error in persona Ne bis in idem Asas legalitas/ Retroaktivitas Asas oportunitas Verjaring Qualificeer Delict & Bestandelen Delict Samenloop dan deelneming Concursus realis /C.idealis

COURT JUDGMENT Court Judgment Executor Final and Binding Judgment /Vonis: General Attorney Office Administrative/Judicial Decree: Public Prosecutor Prosecution by FD *

Summary Exam’n Procedure Art. 203 (1): misdemeanors not stipulated in Art. 205, simple evidence and straightforward application of law. No Indictment was made by PP- just verbally informs to the accused (Art. 203 para (3)a CP Code). The notification will replace the indictment. Head Judge could order the PP to conduct supplemental examination (Art. 203 para (3) b CP Code).

Summary Exam’n Procedure The judgment was recorded in minutes of trial (Art. 203 para (3) CP Code) A document provide which content the ground of judgment. (Art. 203 para (3) e CP Code).

Express Exam Procedure: Art. 205: Minor Offense (threatened with a penalty of the most 3 months/a fine of at most Rp.2.500.000 - or minor defamation (Revised by Supreme Court No 2./2012) Divided into: Minor Offense/defamation Traffic violation case The presence of the accused is not mandatory (213)

Minor Offense Exam Procedure Investigator under power of attorney from PP, in 3 days, present the accused, witness,evidence,etc (Art. 205 para (2)). Single judge at first and last stage. An Appeal may only if penalty is rendered depriving liberty. (Art. 205 para (3)). Art. 208: witness shall not make an oath/affirmation. No minutes of examination (Art. 209).

Traffic violation Case Procedure Single judge; No minutes of trial (Art. 212). The accused could assign a person to represent the accused at trial (Art. 213 KUHAP). verstek or in absentia. Art. 214 para (1) KUHAP. A Challenge only if penalty depriving liberty is rendered (Art. 214 para (4)). Within 7 days: may lodge a challenge (Art. 214 para (5) CP Code). By such Challenge, the in absentia judgment shall be vacated. (Art. 214 para 8).

COMPARISON Express (Pemr. Cepat) Summary (Pemeriksaan Singkat) Pasal 203 (1): di luar 205, pembuktian mudah dan sederhana Penuntut umum tidak membuat surat dakwaan (Pasal 203 ayat (3)a KUHAP). Pasal 205: Tipiring maks pidana 3 bulan dan atau denda maks Rp.7.500,- dan penghinaan ringan Dibagi 2: Acr Pemeriksaan Tipiring Acr Pem Pelanggaran LL Tipiring: Penyidik a/ Kuasa PU langsung menghadapkan semuanya ke Pengadilan (Pasal 205 ayat (2) KUHAP).

COMPARATION Summary (Pemr Singkat) Minor Offence hakim tunggal Majelis Hakim Upaya Hukum Biasa Hakim dapat meminta penuntut umum membuat pemeriksaan tambahan (Pasal 203 ayat (3) b KUHAP). Saksi Mengucap Sumpah hakim tunggal Kec dijatuhkan pidana perampasan kemerdekaan, tdw Br dpt banding (Pasal 205 ayat (3) KUHAP). Pasal 208 KUHAP, saksi tidak mengucapkan sumpah /janji kec hakim menganggap perlu.

COMPARATION Minor Offense Summary (Singkat) Putusan dicatat dalam berita acara sidang (Pasal 203 ayat ayat (3) KUHAP) Hakim membuat surat yang memuat amar putusan tersebut (Pasal 203 ayat (3) e KUHAP). Putusan dicatat dalam daftar Perkara Berita acara pemeriksaan sidang tidak dibuat (Pasal 209 KUHAP).

CORRUPTION COURT EXAMINATION

IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn (C) is taken out of a police station in New York on May 15, 2011. Photograph: Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images The head of the International Money Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has agreed to undergo scientific and forensic tests and intends to "vigorously" defend himself against charges that he sexually assaulted a hotel maid, lawyers said late Sunday.

This courtroom drawing shows Judge Michael Sonberg presiding during procedures calling for the delay in the arraignment of IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Dominique Strauss-Kahn: medical examination delays court appearance...