Penulisan Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi Devanto S. Pratomo, Ph.D Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis & Tim Peningkatan Publikasi International Karya Ilmiah Dosen (PPIKID) Universitas Brawijaya

Biodata Name : Devanto S. Pratomo nick name : de-de atau Dev Occupation : Academic Staff FEB-UB Date of Birth : Malang, 3/10/1976 Specialization : Labour Economics, Applied Econometrics email : devanto@ub.ac.id Awards : SEAMEO Jasper Research Award 2013 Dosen Berprestasi II UB 2010 Best Paper Award JIEB UGM 2010 Background Study : S1 (SE) FEB UB Economics Development,1998 S2 (MSi) UGM, Yogyakarta, 2001 S2 (MA) Georgia State, US, 2003 S3 (Ph.D) Lancaster University, UK, 2009

Key Publications 1 The Effects of Changes in Minimum Wage on Employment in Indonesia: Regional Panel Data Analysis International Research Journal of Finance and Economics (62: 2011), SCOPUS 2. Minimum Wage Effects throughout the Wage Distribution: Evidence from Indonesia European Journal of Economics, Finance & Economics (44: 2012), SCOPUS 3. Do Migrants Get Stuck in the Informal Sector? Findings of a Household Survey in Four Indonesian Cities Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies (with Chris Manning), Taylor & Francis Publ, 49(2) 2013, ISI/SCOPUS 4. The Roles of Network of Migrants: The Case of Returned Migrants in East Java Journal of Interdiciplinary Economics,SAGE Publ, 25(1/2) 2013, SCOPUS 5. Does Minimum Wage Affect Hours Worked of Paid Employment in Indonesia? International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Publ, 41(5) 2014, SCOPUS

Pentingnya Publikasi Karya Ilmiah (Jurnal Ilmiah)

Jurnal Ilmiah: Dipublikasikan secara periodik Menyebarluaskan penelitian baru, temuan baru, metode baru Melalui peer review process Sebuah platform untuk mendistribusikan pengetahuan (knowledge) (see: Noble Prize Winner)

Jurnal International (Dikti, 2014) Jurnal internasional adalah jurnal yang memenuhi kriteria sebagai berikut: a. Karya ilmiah yang diterbitkan ditulis dengan memenuhi kaidah ilmiah dan etika keilmuan b. Memiliki ISSN c. Ditulis dengan menggunakan bahasa resmi PBB (Arab, Inggris, Perancis, Rusia, Spanyol dan Tiongkok) d. Memiliki terbitan versi online e. Dewan Redaksi (Editorial Board) adalah pakar di bidangnya paling sedikit berasal dari 4 (empat) negara.

Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi: Jurnal internasional bereputasi adalah jurnal yang memenuhi kriteria jurnal internasional dengan kriteria tambahan (1) terindek pada Web of Science dan/atau Scopus (2) mempunyai faktor dampak (impact factor) dari ISI Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) atau Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) Tambahan: Tidak tergolong jurnal predator

Scopus mengeluarkan Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) Scopus – bibliographical database containing abstracts and citations for scientific journals maintained by Elsevier. 20,000 of 21,000 titles are peer reviewed journals Scopus mengeluarkan Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)

Impact Factor (by Thompson Reuter) The impact factor is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field, with journals with higher impact factors deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information. Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for those journals that are indexed in the  Journal Citation Reports.

The impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of current citations to articles published in the two previous years by the total number of articles published in the two previous years. Semakin tinggi impact factornya, maka semakin penting jurnal tersebut bagi ilmu pengetahuan.

Setiap tahun dunia mempublikasikan lebih dari 2 Setiap tahun dunia mempublikasikan lebih dari 2.5 juta artikel ilmiah (Scopus) Sumber: Scopus dalam Yusuf (2013)

Tahun 2014, Indonesia mempublikasikan 5,665 artikel, Malaysia 25,883 (400% lebih banyak)

Terindikasikan, publikasi Indonesia bukan murni “made-in-Indonesia” Sumber: Scopus dalam Yusuf (2013)

Ada keterkaitan kuat antara produktivitas publikasi dengan kondisi ekonomi suatu negara . Publikasi pada Jurnal Internasional bereputasi merupakan salah satu tolok ukur daya saing bangsa .

Mengapa perlu publikasikan karya kita? Academic/Researcher Career (Pangkat dan Jabatan) Establish a name and Reputation (also good for University): Iklan Diri (dari topik penelitian dan sitasi) Mengundang collaboration dengan peneliti lain “Semoga bukan hanya untuk syarat Wisuda/syarat lulus S3” = Pertama dan Terakhir

Anatomi Jurnal Internasional

Filosofi dalam menulis Jurnal: tulisan harus ringkas, padat, tetapi tetap harus lengkap dan jelas. Artinya (1) pembaca mengerti apa yang ditulis tanpa harus bertanya kepada penulisnya, dan (2) jika pembaca ingin menguji/melakukan penelitian yang sama, dengan membaca artikel tersebut pembaca telah dapat melakukannya (sitasi). Berbeda dengan menulis tesis/disertasi: detail, panjang lebar dan selengkap-lengkapnya

Focusing on a Topic Asking questions while planning the research - Is the topic of enough interest? - Will the results be of interest to others? Terkadang kita merasa topik tersebut menarik tetapi bagi orang lain belum tentu menarik - Is the topic likely to be publishable? Does the study (1) develop new ideas in the scholarly literature, (2) fill a gap, (3) extend, (4) replicate ?

Abstract (and Keywords) Introduction/Background Hampir semua jurnal memiliki struktur sama Title (Cover Page) Abstract (and Keywords) Introduction/Background Literature Review (tidak harus) Data and Methodology Results and Discussion Conclusion References

Title Judul : menarik, berbeda dengan judul yang sudah banyak kalau perlu agak bombastis/lebay. Korenman, Sanders, and David Neumark. "Does marriage really make men more productive?." Journal of Human Resources (1991): 282-307. Chen, Jonathan. "Indonesia's presidential dilemma: can Jokowi avoid the accountability trap?." (2014). Filmer, Deon, and David L. Lindauer. "Does Indonesia Have a'Low Pay'Civil Service?." Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 37.2 (2001): 189-205.

Abstract ‘versi’ pendek dari artikel; hendaknya berisi semua informasi yang diperlukan pembaca untuk mengetahui: (1) Tujuan penelitian; (2) Cara melakukan penelitian (methodology)/data (3) Hasil yang diperoleh Hasil kuantitatif perlu disampaikan (kalau ada) tetapi hanya hasil kunci saja, tidak perlu detail tanpa paragraf tanpa referensi Ditulis terakhir Usually 150-400 words (according to journal)

Contoh: This paper examines the inequality in education in Indonesia measured by Gini coefficients across different urban-rural, provinces, districts and gender . The main data used in this study is the 2010 Population Census, comparing with the two previous censuses in 1990 and 2000. Using 2SLS regression, this paper also checks whether inequality in education across 494 districts in Indonesia are related in any systematic ways to some indicator of economic development, such as per capita income and poverty level. The analysis finds that education inequality in Indonesia has been declining during three decades. The gender gaps on inequality have become diminished. Finally, the educational inequality is negatively related with per capita GDP and positively related with poverty at district levels.

This study examines the role of social networks in the overseas migration decisions of workers from East Java, Indonesia. The data for this study are obtained from a survey of 363 respondents in Sumberejo village, located in Malang district in East Java. This district is well known as one of the main contributors of Indonesian labour migrants to overseas. Using a multinomial logit specification across different labour market outcomes, this study finds that labour recruiters or middlemen play the most important role in labour migrants’ decisions to work overseas, although middlemen are in fact are not allowed by regulation. The number of friends and relatives respondents feel close to is also a significant factor, but not as high as middlemen. Relatives have a positive and significant effect for the respondents who worked in the formal sector, while friends have a significantly positive effect for the respondents who worked in the informal sector.

EFFECT OF WATER MANAGEMENT ON YIELD OF TOMATO PLANT ABSTRACT A green house experiment was conducted to study the effect of water management on the growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plant. The treatments included the amount of irrigated water and the growth phase at which the watering was done. The ammount water addition was calculated based on the percentage of crop factor (kc) to evapotranspiration, and the combination treatments were: (1) the amount of water addition the same with the evapotranspiration throughout the growth of tomato crop, 100% kc; (2) 100% kc at vegetative growth and 70% kc at generative growth; (3) 70% kc at vegetative and 100% kc at generative growth; (4) 70% kc at vegetative and 70% kc at generative growth: (5)) 100% kc at vegetative and 40% kc at generative growth; (6) 40% kc at vegetative growth and 100% kc at generative growth; and (7) 40% kc at vegetative and 40% kc at generative growth. The experimental results showed that addition of water at the combination level of 70% kc at vegetative and 100% kc t generative growth reduced the number of fruit yield, the number of healthy fruits and the number of marketable fruits. The addition of water at a combination level of 40% kc at vegetative growth and 40% kc at generative growth decreased plant height, leaf number and total fruit yield. The addition of water at a combination level of eiither 100% kc at vegetative growth and 70% kc generative growth or 40% kc at vegetative growth and at 100% kc generative growth was enough to produce a high yield (1307 g/plant and 1320 g/plant) which were not significantly different with that of the plants had no suffer from water shortage (100 % kc).. Key words: Water stress, irrigation, crop factor, evapotranspiration

Introduction create reader interest (background information); mengantarkan pembaca untuk masuk ke fokus penelitian; kalau pembaca sudah tertarik pada bagian depan akan memutuskan untuk melanjutkan membaca bagian belakangnya (penulis pun demikian) focus on an issue, a problem or a question relevant to the study (tidak lari kemana-mana); tips: general to specific akhirnya mengarah ke objective of this study (Tujuan penelitian)

Yang ada di Introduction(1): Selain latar belakang: review beberapa previous research (dan teori) penting; (dari sini research GAP itu muncul) discuss deficiencies in previous research on the topic; Berani untuk menjelaskan kelemahan previous study how it differ from previous study propose a new/different way of investigating the same topic/aspect of the topic: It’s your contribution

Example: This article’s contribution is its examination of intergenerational socioeconomic mobility: it compares the earnings of migrants with those of their parents, and the earnings and occupations of the children of migrants with those of their parents.

Example: This study contributes to the literature by employing the sample selection corrections based on a multinomial logit for a potential selection bias from a non-random sample This study also extends the hours worked specification by analyzing the effects of minimum wage on hours worked separately across individuals in different groups of workers, in terms of gender (male-female workers) and their residences (urban-rural areas).

Yang ada di Introduction (2) Sebutkan tujuan penelitian dengan jelas di bagian ini. This study focuses on two main objectives. The first objective is to measure the educational inequality in Indonesia across educational levels in Indonesia based on 2010 Population Census. The second objective is to see the relationship between educational gini and labour market performance as measured by the unemployment rate and average wage across districts in Indonesia.

Yang ada di Introduction (3) Explain flow of the rest/outline di bagian paling akhir Example: The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the previous minimum wage studies using panel data sets. Section 3 discusses the methodology used in this study. Section 4 explains the main data sources for this research. Section 5 analyses the main findings. Finally, section 6 provides conclusions.

Kelemahan Penulis: Introduction Tidak secara eksplisit menjelaskan kontribusinya/research gap nya: biasanya karena kurang membaca Penulisan tidak “general to specific”, sehingga jadi lari kemana-mana

Research Method/Data & Method Esensi: harus jelas sehingga jika orang lain akan melakukan penelitian serupa bisa melakukannya tanpa harus bertanya pd penulis Biasanya disajikan secara naratif (running style, kurangi pointers) Descriptive Statistics mutlak diperlukan (kalau pendekatannya kuantitatif)

Statistical analysis: Clear what the analytical to be used Kalau metode itu sudah seringkali dipakai, dan sangat-sangat umum maka seringkali cukup hanya memberikan reference. Namun apabila metode itu tidak terlalu umum harus dijelaskan Semua simbol/notasi matematis harus dapat dipahami/dijelaskan

Results and Discussion/Findings refer to previous work/comparison with other studies/theory mengapa berbeda atau sama dengan peneliti sebelumnya  This is consistent with Hill and Thee (2012) discussion that many migrants with senior secondary education continue their post-secondary education in the cities as the universities are concentrated in urban areas. Unlike previous studies, the result shows that there is no significant impact of the minimum wage on total paid employment because of the non-compliance problem in Indonesia.

Kelemahan Penulis: Findings Asyik bercerita tentang hasil temuannya tapi lupa untuk mengkaitkan dengan penelitian sebelumnya/teori. Karena dari situ sekali lagi menjelaskan posisi penelitian kita. Sehingga tidak terlihat referensi sama sekali disitu.

Conclusions Four basic steps to take in writing an ideal conclusion (the ‘4S’ model)- running style 1: Summarise your research 2: Spell out your contribution (& also implication) 3: State the limitations of your study 4: Suggest potential areas of further research

This article has focused on the determinants of occupational change and associated earnings among different cohorts of migrants moving from rural areas to cities in Indonesia. Our findings for Indonesia confirm that rural–urban migration is an important source of occupational mobility. In answering the question posed in the title of this article, our analysis suggests that migrants do not get stuck in the informal sector.

Our limitation is there is a problem of selection bias – as with most studies of migration – since data were collected from only those migrants who remained in the city, and not from those who returned to their villages This subject,too, should be the focus of further research.

Kelemahan Penulis: Conclusions Terlalu singkat atau terlalu rinci Memasukkan saran/implikasi kebijakan tetapi tidak terkait dengan hasil/temuan Terlalu banyak angka (kuantitatif)

References: Gunakan prinsip relevansi, keterbaruan, artikel di Jurnal diutamakan, dapat dilacak secara online, ikuti pedoman jurnal ybs dan reference yg ada di teks harus sama dgn di daftar reference (Reference bukan Daftar Bacaan) Tips: Ada Kecenderungan Jurnal Bereputasi akan melihat apakah penulis memakai referensi dari publisher jurnal yang bersangkutan. (Memperbesar Kemungkinan Diterima)

Kelemahan Penulis Indonesia: References didalam teks tidak sama dengan di daftar references. References di Jurnal berbeda dengan Daftar Bacaan. Kurang relevan/keterbaruan/tidak mengikuti perkembangan Tidak dapat dilacak Menggunakan references yang tidak seharusnya (diktat kuliah, pustaka dalam artikel penulis lain, wikipedia)

Penggunaan Bahasa Inggris Menulis Jurnal/Publikasi Ilmiah dalam Bahasa Inggris adalah sebuah SKILL, yang harus/dapat dilatih A good paper does not come out perfect first time for anyone, so do not feel bad, and do not skimp on revisions! Syarat utama: Sediakan waktu yang cukup (terkadang harus sediakan waktu ekstra) dan juga kemuan yang keras untuk berlatih Ingat: The quality of the writing reflects the quality of the research

Karena keterbatasan kemampuan bahasa/waktu, banyak yang menggunakan translator/mesin Karena penulisan jurnal ilmiah international hanya sebagai tujuan jangka pendek: kelulusan, insentif dsb. Kelemahan: Tidak semua translator adalah baik, Bahasa Indonesia “tidak mudah” untuk diterjemahkan. Need to check and recheck. More important: PROOFREADER!!!  check your paper to catch and correct these and other common errors:

Kesalahan Umum Penggunaan Google Translate classification of the RPR (-) and RPs (+), indicating pertumbuhhan buffalo are not prominent in the reference area (district) but the potential developed in the study area (district) There is a decrease in buffalo population in the five years since the population dropped 1,297 observations tail The data is collected in unlucky regency

Baseline (Trillion IDR) The change of domestic output volume (%)  [ (Table 2-5) Kesalahan Umum Text sudah diubah dalam bahasa inggris, tetapi tabel tidak dirubah Koma dirubah menjadi titik, dan sebaliknya Table 1.The Change of Domestic Output Volume No Sectors Baseline (Trillion IDR) The change of domestic output volume (%) Sim 1 Sim 2 Sim 3 Sim 4  1 Food Crops 446 -6,73 -5,83 1,57 2 Sugarcane Plantation 26 11,54 7,69 3 Other Agricultural Crops 713 -4,42 -1,19 7,46 4 Sugar Industry 53 3,77 1,89 5 Food and Beverage Industry 669 1,20 3,44 6 Fertilizer and Pesticide Industry 46 2,17 7 Other Industries 4.517 0,30 1,7 5,24 8 Services 16.771 -10,07 3,87 17,39 -10,12

Kesalahan Umum Kata sambung tidak di awal kalimat. But, And Hindari Penggunaan kata Author, Writer, Researcher, I, We

Plagiarisme

Definisi Plagiat merupakan perbuatan secara sengaja atau tidak sengaja dalam memperoleh atau mencoba memperoleh kredit atau nilai untuk suatu karya ilmiah, dengan mengutip sebagian atau seluruh karya dan/atau karya ilmiah orang lain, tanpa menyatakan sumber secara tepat dan memadai (Permendiknas No 17 tahun 2010, Pasal 1 Ayat 1).

Plagiat terjadi apabila seseorang : (1) salah pengertian mengenai tatacara penulisan rujukan, misalnya: “yang penting sudah tertulis di daftar pustaka” atau “yang penting sudah diberi referensi”. Itu tidak selalu cukup! (2) Biasanya terlalu bergantung atas suatu sumber rujukan, (3) kemampuan menggunakan bahasa yang lemah, dan (4) kecerobohan dalam melakukan pencatatan.

Secara umum, seseorang melakukan plagiat karena: Tidak tahu bahwa plagiarisme adalah tindak kejahatan akademik (Don’t know). Tahu bahwa plagiarisme adalah tindak ilegal, tapi tidak tahu bagaimana cara menghindarinya (Don’t know how). Tahu bahwa plagiarisme adalah tindak ilegal, tapi tidak peduli (nikmat, cara gratis mendapat nilai dan menjadi sarjana) (Don’t care) Managemen waktu yang buruk. Merasa yakin bahwa orang lain tak akan mendeteksi apa yang dilakukan.

Kita akan terhindar dari plagiarisme jika menyatakan secara jelas dan secara benar setiap saat kita menggunakan: Ide, pendapat dan teori orang lain. Mengutip (memberi tanda “....”) pada tulisan atau perkataan orang lain (kalimat langsung) dengan tetap menyebutkan sumber. Melakukan paraphrase (menuliskan/mengucapkan ide orang lain dengan kalimat kita sendiri) dan tetap menyebutkan sumber.

Paraphrase: menulis ulang intisari dari sumber lain Paraphrase: menulis ulang intisari dari sumber lain. Tidak perlu diberi tanda kutip, tapi wajib dibutkan sumbernya Teknik melakukan paraphrase menurut Knowles (2007): Baca dan baca lagi bacaan asli hingga anda mengerti. Ganti sebanyak mungkin kata dari bacaan asli dengan sinonim yang cocok. Ganti bentuk tata bahasa (misal: kalimat pasif menjadi kalimat aktif). Hindari menggunakan kata-kata yang sama dengan kata-kata pada bacaan asli, kecuali kata-kata yang tidak ada sinonim-nya (misal: unsur kimia, nama tempat, nama orang, penyakit, dll).

Self-Plagiarism (Autoplagiarism) Plagiat yang dilakukan dari tulisan kita sendiri. Kita seringkali ‘tergoda’ untuk tidak menuliskan referensi karena berasal dari tulisan kita sendiri Republishing the same paper published elsewhere without notifying the reader nor publisher (conference paper dengan ISSN dan Jurnal)

Potential S-P: Publishing a significant study as smaller studies to increase the number of publications misalnya dari 1 disertasi dibagi menjadi 2 atau 3 tulisan.

Pilihan Publikasi Journal

Issue: Speed of publication (Kecepatan) vs Kualitas: Issue predator vs Scopus Indexed quickly, some fees, not hard vs hard, more time but free of charge Tantangan: Balancing need to publish “quickly” vs. selecting a good journal to publish in

Predator Journal (Questionable Journal): scholarlyoa.com

International Journal by Inul Daratista & Agnes Monica

Important on decide a journal Top-tier journals usually reject more than 50 percent of the papers submitted to them some have rejection rates as high as 70% Third (low) tier journal rarely reject a paper unless the entire study is flawed or the data are improperly interpreted Experience gained from previous publishing helps very well

Some Tips (1) Syarat utama: Sediakan waktu yang cukup (terkadang harus sediakan waktu ekstra) dan juga kemuan yang keras untuk berlatih: Writing is Skill

Some Tips (2) Start with a conference paper Examine and study carefully a sample of journal papers, this will give you some insights into the expectations and standards for a refereed journal paper Decide on a journal paper which is relevant to your area of research Draft an outline of your paper and discuss with co-author/colleague Produce the first draft Pass paper to your colleagues for comments Submit paper – Remember: “Editor is the King” Etika Penulisan: Tidak mengirimkan manuscript ke lebih dari satu jurnal

Review Results Accept: "Which almost nobody gets,“ ;-) Accept with revision: "Just make some minor changes." Revise and resubmit (major revision): "They're still interested in you!" Reject and resubmit: Though not as good as revise and resubmit, "they still want the paper!" Reject Don't put off the revisions If you are invited to revise, "Do it, do it fast and don't delay".

Example: JDS 19-Mar-2010 Dear Dr. Pratomo, I refer to your paper entitled  "The Effects of Changes in Minimum Wage on Employment in Indonesia: Regional Panel Data Analysis" which you submitted to the Journal of Development Studies, and regret to inform you that we are unable to publish the paper in its present form. The reports of three referees are provided below; although they see merit in what you are doing all recommend major revisions. The reports are quite detailed but a number of specific concerns arise more than once. Some of the concerns are sufficiently serious to merit rejection.  However, as the issue is of interest and the literature (in general journals) is limited, we will give you an opportunity to resubmit if you can substantially revise the paper to address the concerns. The revisions required are substantial and involve a complete rewrite (you should get it proofed by an English-language reader before resubmitting), whilst addressing the data and econometric concerns may result in a substantially different paper

Where to Publish Good to seek advice from authors who have published previously Know the prestige and policy of the journal Ensure manuscript to match with journal requirements As a strategy try avoid journals that have a very high rejection rate Tips Bahasa: Adakah penulis dari negara yang English=second language

Example of Good Journals Elsevier http://www.elsevierdirect.com/index.jsp Springer http://link.springer.com/ Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Taylor and Francis http://www.tandfonline.com/ (*) Sage http://online.sagepub.com/ (*) Emerald http://www.emeralddinsight.com/ (*) Inderscience http://www.inderscience.com/index.php (*) World Scientific http://www.worldscientific.com/

IJSEC 41(5) 2014 The research paper on ‘Does Minimum Wage Affect Hours Worked of Paid Employment in Indonesia’ is well written by the author(s). Notwithstanding the merit of the paper, the scope and relevance of the paper can be further enriched, if the following aspects are considered. 1. The economic literature on minimum wages is longstanding and vast. The paper should elaborate more rigorously an in-depth review of the field, which continues to be characterized by (dis)agreement on how a minimum wage affects employment. There is no clear and no quantitatively relevant relationship between minimum wage development and employment. As always in a debate between different theoretical approaches, the empirical results are mixed depending on the theory used as a basis for the research. The author is advised to provide a section on review of exiting studies in tabular form for the comparison and develop a conceptual framework.The paper should provide a section on review of exiting studies in tabular form for the comparison and develop a conceptual framework. 2. The paper is well written. However, it requires more elaboration of findings and conclusions. 3. The paper should include a section of policy implications for the research.

Terima Kasih