QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) :

Slides:



Advertisements
Presentasi serupa
Tahapan information engineering
Advertisements

Variasi proses. It is all about patients First do no harm Second achieve best clinical outcome Third make the people “fly”
Managing Software Requirements (manajemen kebutuhan perangkat lunak)
Manajemen Risiko Strategi Risiko Reaktif & Proaktif
RENCANA PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK (RPPL)
Investigasi/ Analisa Sebab Kecelakaan Kerja
KONTEKS & PROSES MANAJEMEN PROYEK
Control Objectives for Information and related Technology
Learning Outcomes Pada akhir pertemuan ini, diharapkan mahasiswa akan mampu : Mahasiswa dapat membuat diagram / skema untuk assessment setiap tahap pengembangan.
Project Integration Management
Universitas Indonesia. Dasar Kompetisi FLEXIBLE COMPANY QUALITY COMPANY EFFICIENT COMPANY INOVASI PILIHAN KUALITAS BIAYA ORGANISASI YANG INOVATIF ORGANISASI.
TEORI ORGANISASI DAN MANAJEMEN PENGETAHUAN
ANALISA PERANCANGAN SISTEM
Pertemuan 25 EVALUASI DAN MANAJEMEN PROYEK Matakuliah: S0174/Evaluasi dan Manajemen Proyek Tahun: 2006 Versi: 1.
1 Pertemuan 09 Kebutuhan Sistem Matakuliah: T0234 / Sistem Informasi Geografis Tahun: 2005 Versi: 01/revisi 1.
K3 Objective of safety awareness is to make students :
1 Pertemuan 12 Pengkodean & Implementasi Matakuliah: T0234 / Sistem Informasi Geografis Tahun: 2005 Versi: 01/revisi 1.
1 Pertemuan 21 Function Matakuliah: M0086/Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2005 Versi: 5.
INDONESIA INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE IURSP – Monitoring dan Evaluasi IURSP – Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop 3 Steve Brown VicRoads International Projects.
Manajemen Proyek Sistem Informasi
Perencanaan Pengujian (Test Plan) Pertemuan 4
1 Pertemuan 11 Function dari System Matakuliah: M0446/Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2005 Versi: 0/0.
H EALTH S YSTEM R APID D IAGNOSTIC T OOL TO M EASURE THE S TRENGTH OF P RIORITY H EALTH S YSTEM F UNCTIONS Public Health Department Faculty of Medicine.
1 INTRODUCTION Pertemuan 1 s.d 2 Matakuliah: A0554/Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Tahun: 2006.
Manajemen Risiko Proyek Eko Ruddy Cahyadi. Risiko Proyek Peristiwa tidak pasti yang bila terjadi memiliki pengaruh positif atau negatif terhadap minimal.
ANALISA KINERJA SISTEM
QA DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
ANALISA KESELAMATAN KERJA
Pert. 16. Menyimak lingkungan IS/IT saat ini
Behavior Based Safety.
IT AUDITS IT audits: pemeriksaan terhadap proses atau data yang melekat dengan teknologi informasi. Berkaitan dengan internal, external, dan fraud audits.
QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) : Ny
OHS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HENDRA.
PERENCANAAN ERA HADI ALIKODRA 2011.
ANALISIS INFORMASI RCA4..
Pertemuan 10: Manajemen Resiko.
QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) :
Investigasi/ Analisa Sebab Kecelakaan Kerja
Hygiene, Keamanan dan Keselamatan Kerja Pertemuan 1
Pengukuran Kinerja Sistem
MATERI PERENCANAAN PENDIDIKAN
CA113 Pengantar Manajemen Bisnis
QA DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) : Ny. Rokiah Kusumapradja
Software Engineering Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak
the formula for the standard deviation:
Bug Tracking Database (2) Pertemuan 7
Topik 2 : PERFRORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
MENETAPKAN KEPUTUSAN ETIK
Dr Rilla Gantino, SE., AK., MM
CA113 Pengantar Manajemen Bisnis
Phase III Rapid Prototyping and Demonstration Prototype
THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING TYPE JIGSAW PROBLEM SOLVING
Dasar-Dasar Sistem Informasi
Topik 7 : AUDIT MEDIS TUJUAN INSTRUKSIONAL MATERI PERKULIAHAN
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.
Manajemen Risiko Proyek
Manajemen Resiko Proyek
Evidence-Based Medicine Prof. Carl Heneghan Director CEBM University of Oxford.
CA113 Pengantar Manajemen Bisnis
Manajemen Proyek
Pengukuran Kinerja Sistem
Manajemen Proyek
Manajemen Proyek
Pengukuran Kinerja Sistem
Monitoring & Evaluasi Framework Dalam Monev.
Software Testing Strategies
Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why? William A. Lindley April 6, 2001.
FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA)
Risk analysis RCA FMEA.
Analisis Medan Daya (Force field analysis) Ditemukan oleh Kurt Lewin 1951 Metode yg digunakan untuk mendapatkan gambaran yg konfrehensif kekuatan2 yang.
Transcript presentasi:

QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) : Topik 4 : Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah TUJUAN INSTRUKSIONAL MATERI PERKULIAHAN

TUJUAN INSTRUKSIONAL UMUM Setelah selesai mengikuti perkuliahan ini diharapkan mahasiswa dapat mengetahui ruang lingkup dan tujuan mata ajar Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah Klik di sini untuk melanjutkan

TUJUAN INSTRUKSIONAL KHUSUS Mahasiswa dapat menyebutkan Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah Mahasiswa dapat menguraikan Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah Mahasiswa dapat menggambarkan Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah Klik di sini untuk melanjutkan

Ny. Rokiah Kusumapradja Peningkatan praktik klinik dan analisis akar masalah (CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ) Ny. Rokiah Kusumapradja

KUALITAS DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DEFINISI : “DOING THE RIGHT THING, THE FIRST TIME, IN THE RIGHT WAY, AT THE RIGHT TIME” PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DAN KLINISI BERKEWAJIBAN MEMBERIKAN KUALITAS PEL. SECARA EFEKTIF DAN MENJAMIN BAHWA PELAYANAN YANG DIBERIKAN : AMAN, EFEKTIF, MEMADAI, FOCUS PD PASIEN, MUDAH DIJANGKAU, DAN EFISIEN.

STRATEGI PENCAPAIAN PELAYANAN BERKUALITAS : MEMFASILITASI MONITORING INSIDEN MONITORING SENTINEL EVENT MENGGUNAKAN INDIKATOR KLINIK SECARA EFEKTIF PEER REVIEW MEETING MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY MEETING AD HOC AUDITS RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW

2 PENDEKATAN : CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT (CPI) CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT (CPI) MENJELASKAN MODEL YANG DIGUNAKAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PROSES ASUHAN DAN PEMBERIAN PELAYANAN QUALITY IMPROMENT TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES  SUATU PETUNJUK DALAM MEMILIH DAN MENGGUNAKAN ALAT DAN TEHNIK YANG TEPAT UNTUK BERBAGAI TAHAPAN PROSES PENINGKATAN 2. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ( RCA)

CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS (JCAHO,2003) Single incident, sentinel event or near miss identified If SAC = 1 -Do RCA A team is assessbled RCA undertaken Determine sequence of events Identify causal factors, Select root causes Action and recommendations Made to management Implementation / Change occur Lessons learnt System issue Assesment against the Safety assesst code(SAC) If a criminal or Intentionally unsafe Act, substance related Or abuse = performance review Determine the Significance Of the event Collect The facts Bring together The people who have the knowledge Understand The event To ensure Investi gation accuracy Identify the Factors that Contributed To the event Ensure Recommended Action address To causes Ensure corrective Action plan is implemented Evaluate Effectiveness Of actions Aggregate, complex or Validation data obtained from incidents, indicators, Peer review and complaints Form Guidance team Form project team Develop Aims statement Evidence needed to Diagnose problem Organize and prioritise information Decide on intervention Small test PDSA cycles Sustain the gains And evaluation Ensure action achieve the desired result Process flow chart  Customer focus groups Brainstorming /tally chart cause & effect diagram  Afinity diagram Pareto diagram,Graphs  Run chart or SPC chart Measure impact Implement the changes Annotated run chart SPC Chart  Other graphs  Standardisation  Documentation  Measurement  training 1. The project 2. Diagnostic phase 3. Inter vention 4. Im pact 5. Sustai ning improv Select Appropriate 1. The plan 2. do 3. study 4. act

Assesment against the Safety Single incident, sentinel event or near miss identified If a criminal or Intentionally unsafe Act, substance related Or abuse = performance review System issue Assesment against the Safety assesst code(SAC) Determine the Significance Of the event 1. The plan If SAC = 1 -Do RCA Collect The facts Bring together The people who have the knowledge A team is assessbled Select Appropriateteam RCA undertaken Determine sequence of events Understand The event To ensure Investi gation accuracy 2. do Identify causal factors, Select root causes Identify the Factors that Contributed To the event Action and recommendations Made to management 3. study Ensure action achieve the desired result Ensure Recommended Action address To causes Implementation / Change occur Ensure corrective Action plan is implemented 4. act Lessons learnt Evaluate Effectiveness Of actions

Customer focus groups Brainstorming /tally chart Aggregate, complex or Validation data obtained from incidents, indicators, Peer review and complaints 1. The project Form project team Form Guidance team Develop Aims statement Process flow chart  Customer focus groups Brainstorming /tally chart Collect Evidence needed to Diagnose problem 2. Diagnostic phase Organize and prioritise information cause & effect diagram  Afinity diagram Pareto diagram,Graphs  Run chart or SPC chart Decide on intervention 3. Inter vention Small test PDSA cycles Annotated run chart SPC Chart  Other graphs  5. Sustai improv ning Measure impact Implement the changes 4. Im pact Standardisation  Documentation  Measurement  training Sustain the gains And evaluation

Clinical practice improvement model What are we trying to accomplish ? How will we know that a change is an improvement ? What changes can we make that will result in an improvement ? PLAN Plan The Change That to be trialed ACT Implement the Change that have Been proven to Be effective STUDY Evaluate the Impact of the trial DO Conduct a trial Of the proposed change

5 TAHAP PROSES PENINGKATAN ( THE IMPROVEMENT PROCESS ) 1. PROJECT PHASE 5. SUSTAINING IMPROVEMENT PHASE 2. DIAGNOSTIC PHASE 3. IMPACT PHASE p S D A 3. INTERVENTION PHASE p S D A p S D A p S D A p S D A

Jawablah latihan soal topik 2 yang terdapat di : http://elearning/portal/univ/mahasiswa SELAMAT BEKERJA

Jawablah latihan soal topik 4 yang terdapat di : http://elearning/portal/univ/mahasiswa SELAMAT BEKERJA