Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why? William A. Lindley April 6, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Presentasi serupa
2. Introduction to Algorithm and Programming
Advertisements

Manajemen Risiko Strategi Risiko Reaktif & Proaktif
Manajemen Proyek: Overview
Roesfiansjah Rasjidin Program Studi Teknik Industri Fakultas Teknik – Univ. Esa Unggul.
Interesting Interfaces Where We Are At Where We Are Going Contextual Inquiry – Ethnographic Techniques to collect raw data Prototype – Application.
1 Pertemuan 09 Kebutuhan Sistem Matakuliah: T0234 / Sistem Informasi Geografis Tahun: 2005 Versi: 01/revisi 1.
K3 Objective of safety awareness is to make students :
1 Pertemuan 12 Pengkodean & Implementasi Matakuliah: T0234 / Sistem Informasi Geografis Tahun: 2005 Versi: 01/revisi 1.
Masalah Transportasi II (Transportation Problem II)
1 Pertemuan 21 Function Matakuliah: M0086/Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2005 Versi: 5.
1 Pertemuan 5 Komunikasi antar Proses / Interprocess Communication (IPC) Matakuliah: T0316/sistem Operasi Tahun: 2005 Versi/Revisi: 5 OFFCLASS01.
1 Pertemuan 11 Function dari System Matakuliah: M0446/Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2005 Versi: 0/0.
13 Akuntansi Biaya Activity Based Costing
9.3 Geometric Sequences and Series. Objective To find specified terms and the common ratio in a geometric sequence. To find the partial sum of a geometric.
1 INTRODUCTION Pertemuan 1 s.d 2 Matakuliah: A0554/Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Tahun: 2006.
Chapter 10 – The Design of Feedback Control Systems PID Compensation Networks.
The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you are qualified to be a "professional". The questions are not that difficult, so.
Samples: Smart Goals ©2014 Colin G Smith
Pert. 16. Menyimak lingkungan IS/IT saat ini
Konsep pemrograman LOOP
ANALISIS INFORMASI RCA4..
QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) :
Hygiene, Keamanan dan Keselamatan Kerja Pertemuan 1
PREPARATION INSTRUCTION
ALAT-ALAT PENGENDALIAN KUALITAS (2)
Pertemuan <<18>> << Penemuan Fakta(01) >>
METODOLOGI PENELITIAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA
FOKUS MASALAH KULIAH PKP
Kelas VII semester 2 Rahmi Susiswanti
PROBLEM ANALYSIS.
Pengantar Bisnis 7 Sessi.
Dr Rilla Gantino, SE., AK., MM
Kk ilo Associative entity.
KOMUNIKASI EFEKTIF
THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING TYPE JIGSAW PROBLEM SOLVING
Teknik Pengujian Software
Manajemen Proyek Perangkat Lunak (MPPL)
Dasar-Dasar Sistem Informasi
Master data Management
Pertemuan 4 CLASS DIAGRAM.
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.
Manajemen Resiko Proyek
QUALITY ASSURANCE DAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (2 SKS ) :
SAHAM GRUP ASTRA PERIODE JULI 2009 S.D. MARET 2010
Qualities of a Photographer to Cover an Event
How Can I Be A Driver of The Month as I Am Working for Uber?
How the Challenges Make You A Perfect Event Organiser.
Things You Need to Know Before Running on the Beach.
How to Pitch an Event
Don’t Forget to Avail the Timely Offers with Uber
Story of Successful Events, How Visions Becomes Reality.
Evidence-Based Medicine Prof. Carl Heneghan Director CEBM University of Oxford.
Suhandi Wiratama. Before I begin this presentation, I want to thank Mr. Abe first. He taught me many things about CorelDRAW. He also guided me when I.
Ir. Nurly Gofar, MSCE, PhD Program Studi Teknik Sipil Program Pascasarjana Universitas Bina Darma Sem Ganjil 2018/2019 METODOLOGI PENELITIAN.
MAKING A CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
HughesNet was founded in 1971 and it is headquartered in Germantown, Maryland. It is a provider of satellite-based communications services. Hughesnet.
SIMILES. The comparison is carried out using the words ‘like’ as etc. Example : 1. as free as a bird. The word ‘free’ is compared with the word ‘bird’
Right, indonesia is a wonderful country who rich in power energy not only in term of number but also diversity. Energy needs in indonesia are increasingly.
Website: Website Technologies.
Rank Your Ideas The next step is to rank and compare your three high- potential ideas. Rank each one on the three qualities of feasibility, persuasion,
Vector. A VECTOR can describe anything that has both MAGNITUDE and DIRECTION The MAGNITUDE describes the size of the vector. The DIRECTION tells you where.
BY : LUTFIANI RATNA DEWANTI LILIS SINARSIH Action Research.
FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA)
"More Than Words" Saying I love you, Is not the words, I want to hear from you, It's not that I want you, Not to say but if you only knew, How easy, it.
Path Analysis. Path Diagram Single headed arrowruns from cause to effect Double headed bent arrow: correlation The model above assumes that all 5 variables.
Draw a picture that shows where the knife, fork, spoon, and napkin are placed in a table setting.
2. Discussion TASK 1. WORK IN PAIRS Ask your partner. Then, in turn your friend asks you A. what kinds of product are there? B. why do people want to.
By Group 5. Once upon a time a lion was roaming in the jungle in search of a prey. Luckily, he saw a rabbit sleeping fast under a tree. He was delighted.
Wednesday/ September,  There are lots of problems with trade ◦ There may be some ways that some governments can make things better by intervening.
Transcript presentasi:

Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why? William A. Lindley April 6, 2001

Why Do Root Cause Analysis? “Just fix it, there is too much to do.” “We don’t have time to think, we need results now.” Reality - fix symptoms without regard to actual causes Root Cause Analysis - structured and thorough review of problem designed to identify and verify what is causing the symptoms

Definitions Cause (causal factor): a condition or event that results in an effect Direct Cause: cause that directly resulted in the occurrence Contributing Cause: a cause that contributed to the occurrence, but by itself would not have caused the occurrence Root Cause: cause that, if corrected, would prevent recurrence of this and similar occurrences

How Is Root Cause Analysis Done? Teams identify all possible causes The actual root causes are identified and verified Corrective action(s) are identified to reduce or eliminate the problem

RCA Process Need for creative thought to identify all possible causes Collect data about the problem Analyze data Verify causes Relationship between cause and effect

Root Cause Tools Cause and Effect Diagram Scatter Diagram - prove cause-effect relationship Control Chart - process stable? Five Whys Tree Diagram Change Analysis Barrier Analysis Event and Causal Factor Analysis Management Oversight & Risk Tree Analysis (MORT)

Cause Effect Diagram Visual display of possible causes Cause categories include materials, machines, methods, and people Reveals gaps in existing knowledge Helps team reach common understanding of why loss exists

Cause Effect Diagram Problem PeopleProcedures EquipmentMaterials

Cause Effect Diagram Danger: The Cause Effect Diagram is a list of potential root causes. This includes both probable causes, real causes and guesses.

After The Cause Effect Diagram Identify likely candidates for root cause(s) by one of the following actions: Look for causes that appear repeatedly within or across major cause or process categories Look for changes or other sources of variation in the process or environment Use consensus decision-making to select Collect data to confirm a potential root cause as real

Scatter Diagram Test for possible cause and effect relationships Some variation should be expected Relationships being tested must be logical Visual depiction of relationship

Patterns of Correlation Quality Improvement Tools Juran Institute, 1989

Correlation Coefficients Quality Improvement Tools Juran Institute, 1989

Data shows strong positive correlation. Scatter Diagram

Statistical Process Control Process Variation - Common Cause & Special Cause Is the process stable? Points outside LCL/UCL warrant investigation Alert for problems

Five Whys Describe the problem in specific terms For each likely cause ask, “Why did this happen?” Continue for a minimum of five times Show logical relationship of each response to the one that preceded it Stop when the team has enough information to identify the root cause

Tree Diagram State the problem Causes are listed as branches to the right of the problem Continue to clarify causes, drawing additional branches to the right Repeat until each branch reaches its logical end

Tree Diagram Example Training Class Cancelled Not enough students signed up Too much work No reward Schedule not communicated Trainer not prepared New trainer assigned late No time to learn Turnover Materials not completed Late changes Changes up to class date Flexibility Current Training Dept - other projects Floating due date This project- low priority More info needed

Cautionary Note “It’s impossible to solve significant problems using the same level of knowledge that created them!” Albert Einstein

Cautionary Note - Part 2 Cause and effect analysis can’t get past existing knowledge - must have either observed (or considered) that the cause produced the effect in the past

Why not just ask “Why”? Need to systematically organize and analyze data First understand “What happened” then “Why” Typically multiple root causes Blame is an obstacle Guidance needed to investigate human performance problems Need to ask right questions to completely understand why Some RCA techniques may provide easy answers that are either incomplete or wrong (but easy to find)

Event and Causal Factor Analysis Used for multi-faceted problems or long, complex causal factor chains Cause effect diagram that describes time sequence Anything that shapes the outcome recorded Identifies what questions to ask to follow path to root cause

Event and Causal Factor Analysis Event Potential Event Event Condition Sequence of happenings Conditions that may exist, but not identified Found or existing state that influences outcome Condition

Change Analysis Used when problem is obscure Generally used for single occurrence Focuses on things that have changed Compares trouble-free process with occurrence to identify differences Differences evaluated for contribution to occurrence

Change Analysis Steps Occurrence with undesirable consequence Compare Comparable activity without undesired result Identify differences Analyze differences for effect on undesired consequences Integrate information relevant to the causes of undesired consequence

Change Analysis Steps Answer the following: What? When? Where? How? Who?

Barrier Analysis Systematic process to identify barriers or controls that could have prevented the occurrence >Physical >Administrative >Procedural Determine why these barriers or controls failed What is needed to prevent reoccurrence

Barrier Analysis Sequence of events: System Tagout Tag Hung Electricians Given Assignment Electricians Follow Procedure Reactor Trip Barriers Analysis Start Tagout Process Step 1 Tagout Process Step 2 Communications Process Interface ProcedureOccurrence Barrier Holds Barrier Holds Barrier Holds Barrier Fails Barrier Fails Barrier Fails

Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT) Used to prevent oversight in the identification of causal factors Specific factors listed Management factors that permit these factors to exist listed Questions for each factor on the tree are included